Hillary's Village IDEAS - RushOnline.com
It does not take a village, it takes a family!
The village can do both help and hinder but it has no soul. The
village provides health care and ... pushes drugs, it has no soul.
It provides schooling and gang membership, it heals and wounds,
it has no soul. It gives shelter and takes it away, it has no soul.
The village helps the many who fit and forgets the few who do not,
it has no soul. The village is driven by negative characteristics.
Envy, inability of all sorts, intellectual primitivism (which we
call anti-elitism), weakness, etc., are the moving forces in the
village.
** Envy drives the village! Success makes the village try to stop
you under the banner of ... equality. The village does not want
to provide equal rights and opportunities because it likes ... apportioned
rights. Apportioned rights vary by the hour in accordance to the
will of the many (bearers of inabilities of all sorts) in the village!
And the few loose, the village has no virtue!
** Inabilities of all sorts drive the village! The able are attacked,
belittled and satirized and while they feed the ... apportioners...
they are the first to loose. The village has no remorse!
** Intellectual primitivism drives the village! It only has to think
out the simplest ways to ... equalize the successful ... so that
the many who know so little, vote for the few who do so little,
for the few who do so much for the many who envy so much of the
village and so many of the few. The village has no brains!
** Weakness drives the village! Thats why while in office the liberals
inflict weakening wounds on the few so that the many already weak
return them to office! They do that by apportioning rights in accordance
to the villages view of the hour, defined by incessantly polling
the envy, the inability of all sorts, the intellectual primitivism
and the weakness of the village! And the result is always some collective
doctrine that does not apply to any particular case. The village
has no morality!
Will I have to defend the family now? Of course not! The village
offers... bad freely and in large quantities ... while good has
to be extracted through hard work. The family is what has to minimize
the villages influence on offspring and the functional ones do that
successfully. Thats the role of the family, to extract the good
the village so reluctantly relinquishes because it has so little
of it.
I certainly dont have to defend the family! Only room temperature
IQ people would believe that it takes a village! Much as I dislike
liberals I know that IQ is not a conservative exclusive, liberals
have enough of it too! Thats why I think hypocrisy takes a strong
hold of most smart liberals minds and does not release them until
long after they loose ... office. Otherwise, in a brief moment of
liberal honesty, even they would join the conservatives in recognizing
that it does not take a village, the village can not help the children
of America? Not at all!
All anyone has to do to understand that ... it takes a family ...
is to have lived in and survived a communist regime, then one would
know!
I know, I survived one! Hillary does not, she did not!
From Dan in Toronto, Canada
* * *
Hillary has never really been clear insofar as to what the definiton
of "a village" is. She was always much too busy investing
in beef futures, dodging subpoenas and calculatingly hiding paperwork,
plus keeping track of Bill's dalliances to concentrate on much else.
Hillary is many miles removed from what one would define as a mother
and wife. A role model she is NOT! Cold and sinister seems to be
much more appropriate when it comes to describing her persona.
Mick
* * *
THE VILLAGE
In 1997 look for Hillary to press to make "the village"
an entitlement.
Anthony
Subj: "It Takes a Village"
Where have we heard this phrase before ?
Was it over the radio while we were listening to Lawrence Welk
? NO !!
Was it on TV while Dan Rather was having a fit of realism ? NO
!!
Was it maby from an African tribsman while conversing with Hillary
? NO !!
It was in a movie named "BY BY LOVE" with among others
ROB RINER playing a radio talk shrink recited it not only in english
but also in it's native language.
This movie is about two years old , just about the time our Ms.Hillary
made the phraise a national symbol.
Check it out.
From Edwin
* * *
The only thing the Village has ever done for me is take my hard
earned money.
"The Village" takes from those who earn spend on those
who won't "earn" and then complains that we aren't giving
our "fair share."
From T.M.
* * *
The village has changed with each generation. The old village had
values based on more or less common beliefs and had a higher moral
base.
The new village is relativistic, like constantly shifting sands
- Hard to build a firm structure on it.
From Ashley
* * * * *
Hillary probably wants a village to avoid responsiblity. Why should
parents be responsible for thier children? It is much easier to
give the "village" the role of the parents. That way it
is the village's responsiblity to "take care" of your
children and take the blame of any mistakes that may occur in raising
of the children. Therefore, if one's child needs food or clothes
the village or government should pay for it.
Also, if one's child ends up in prison, it is the village's fault
with its bad environment to blame. Where are the parents? Why, thier
role is finished after giving birth, then it is the government's
responsiblity to take over. So, the unburdened liberal parent hardly
noticed that when they gave up the responsiblity, they also gave
up thier freedoms to raise thier children in the way they deem best.
No responsiblity--No Freedom!!!!!
From Bonnie
* * *
Perhaps Hillary's vision for taking care of the "children"
was inspired by the gay disco group "The Village People".
Given the fact that Hillary is vocal in her status as a socialist,
it should come as no surprise that such ideology as community responsibility
for the conditions in which children are raised is advocated in
a book she alegedly wrote.
Utopian socialism is her goal for making the world a better place
in which elitists like herself to live. Hillary's main problem with
actually accomplishing her goals is that no one believes she's sincere.
Her PR people are no where near the caliber of her husband's. Bill's
PR people have managed to convince the average dullard that character
does not matter, that all of the positive effects of a growing economy
are to his credit, and that without him the eeeeeevil Republicans
would starve children and the elderly. If Hillary's PR folks were
that good we might all have to carry our Hillarycare cards by now
to get a flu vaccination.
While Hillary may not be able to turn on the tears at will, she
is more predictable than Bill, and more representative of liberalism.
If you think liberalism is good, ask the victims of travelgate,
or more recently, the chefs. Hillary has earned her reputation!
* * *
Spoiled little Hilleee
What was missing in Hill's own personal village was someone to
spank her lil butt now and then. She missed out on some basic discipline
as a youngster -and it shows.
* * *
Villiage - It takes a mama and a daddy.
Diana
* * *
The Village
There was a tv series that used to air called "the prisoner".What
this whole series revolved around was this place called "the
Village",which in the series was a place for people who knew
too much ,and doubled as a blue print for what the New World order
would be like.The funny thing about this 60's spy/drama thriller
is how it almost mimicks everything The Clintons want to impose
on others.Could it have been a series ahead of it's time?A premonition
of what's to come?I recommend this series highly ,and see if you
notice any similarities between The Village and the Clintons,it's
almost scary!
Mr. O
* * *
The Village
If by the villeage we mean the comunity or even society, then there's
a point to this. These things influence your children anyway, it'd
be nice if it was a helpfull influence instead of something that
parents usually have to struggle against. It's even proper for children
to be seized from the very worst parents, even orphanages would
be preferable in some cases. So if anyone other than Hillary says
this, people are likely to recognise it as an at least partially
true statement.
The problem is, we know this person better than that. We were paying
attention to the context in which she has used words like "society"
in the past. When arguing for some new, unprecedented, possibly
unconstitutional legislation, she says that "society"
has a responsibility to encourage or prevent something. We know
that this dosn't mean the extended family, the Church, neighborhood,
shriners, boy scouts, private charities and bussinesses; it means
the State. The State is not society, it is a substitute for society;
when society fails, that's when the State steps in. The State is
a great thing for punishing crime, protecting us from other States,
ect. ; not so much for child rearing.
I hope it's not innapropriate to try sticking in a link to my site.
It's got some othere stuff I wrote on things like this, and a message
board that's not getting used enough. Do you think Rush reads these?
Dave
I went to the WALL with my wife on my Harley with the other 100,000
motorcycle riders and I too cried like a baby. I too hold the WALL
as a sacred place, and if I didnt have the support of the others
I dont think I could handle it alone. Viet Nam Vet 1967/68
Klinger
* * *
Subj: "Village" thoughts
If it takes a village, then Bill and Hillary must be the village
idiots!
Dave
* * *
Was Hillary really thinking of Bill's sexual (or non-sexual) requirements
when she said, "It takes a Village"?!
Arizona Jim
* * *
The Village
Hillary is a poor excuse for a mother, or a First Lady. She's a
disgrace to all women, and I, for one will never live in her "village"!
Lisa
* * *
Village- Just a liberal term for socialism or communism?
Dennis
