Democratic Hypocrisy - RushOnline.com
This Page Created by: Richard
Prisoners-
Why was America not permitted to see photos of the atrocities at
9-11 yet we see those terrible acts imposed upon Iraqi prisoners?
You ask if we are more perturbed over 9-11 or the current abuses
of Iraqi prisoners. The public did not see photos of the hundreds
who jumped from twin towers or the shattered corpses with shin bones
protruding from their necks. TV cameras moved away from windows
where people at upper floors were leaning out and their fall would
occur, some. we are told, with clothes ablaze. We did hear that
Afghans and others then danced in the streets of Baghdad and in
New York. We never heard of anyone stopping their glee in New York.
Nobody expected apologies and the Congress and people backed when
President Bush who said America will bring retribution to attackers.
Why were photos of our suffering victims not allowed in the press?
We saw a smiling photo of the man who said "Let's roll!" and diverted
the suicide plane from the Whitehouse. We did not see his corpse.
Americans are responding to what is revealed to them. The apologies
must be, and in the Lord's name, but our nation will go down if
we cannot have balanced reporting.
Pray for your ability to provide balance!
Constant listener in Virginia
***
Russian President Putin Takes Bush's Side Against Democrats on
Iraq!
SEA ISLAND, Ga (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin (news
- web sites) stepped into the U.S. political campaign on Thursday,
saying the Democrats had "no moral right" to criticize President
Bush (news - web sites) over Iraq (news - web sites).
The Kremlin leader, answering a reporter's question in Sea Island,
Georgia, suggested that the Democrats were two-faced in criticizing
Bush on Iraq since it had been the Clinton administration that authorized
the 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia by U.S. and NATO (news - web sites)
forces.
He went on: "I am deeply convinced that President Bush's political
adversaries have no moral right to attack him over Iraq because
they did exactly the same.
"It suffices to recall Yugoslavia. Now look at them. They don't
like what President Bush is doing in Iraq."
Russia was adamantly opposed to the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia,
as it has been to the U.S.-led military operation Iraq to topple
Saddam Hussein (news - web sites).
At the same time, Putin forged a strong friendship with Bush by
offering immediate support in the global fight against terrorism.
Both men go out of their way now to avoid criticizing each other
publicly.
***
New definition for Liberal/Democrat: Super Hypocrite
(If there were an Olympic competition for hypocrisy, they would
win gold, silver, and bronze)
Examples:
They wanted to impeach Nixon, and sent Charles
Colson to prison, for having ONE FBI file on an enemy, and plastered
this all over the front page of newspapers. Clinton has over 900
files, but it is "just a mistake" and makes the last pages
of the newspapers.
They fined Gingrich $300,000 for an "ethics
violation," while Clinton violates almost every ethics available
and is not even reprimanded. They fined Gingrich $300,000 for an
"ethics violation," while Democrats who tap his telephone,
record the conversation, and release it to the press (acts that
were made felonies by the Democratic congress).
They complain about the GOP having a "Good
Old Boys" network, but defend Clinton who fires the White House
travel office personnel and replace them with his friends. Complaining
about Nixon using the government to "get" his enemies,
while ignoring the Clinton "Body Count."
They accuse the GOP of misusing "soft money,"
(which is not illegal), while they take illegal money during the
election, and then "give it back" afterwards with no penalties.
Argues that they "did nothing illegal," but "had
to" take illegal money orelse they could not "defeat the
Republicans" during the election (as if that justifies everything
they did), then give it back and say that everything is OK now.
Argue for "Free Speech" while severely
criticizing Reagan and Bush, but then claim that to "criticize
the President is essentially Treason" when Clinton is in office.
Try to blame Reagan for the deficit, when every
budget he proposed was pronounced "Dead on Arrival" when
it came to a Democratically controlled Congress. Try to blame Reagan
for the deficit, while the Democratically controlled Congress would
never cut spending as Reagan asked them to do. Try to blame Reagan
for the Savings and Loan "Crisis," when the Democratic
Congress passed laws to encourage investments in real estate, and
then changed the laws a few years later, making all those investments
bad.
Fighting the appointment of Clarence Thomas for
Justice due to a charge of sexual harassment, denying an appointment
to the Joint Chiefs of Staff to an officer who committed adultery
10 years before, and destroying the careers of Navy fliers for the
"Tailhook Scandal" (and other incidents) because these
men did not have the ethics to be in such offices, yet when Clinton
is concerned, claim "Character does not matter."
Claim that Clinton was responsible for the first
balanced budget, when Clinton did nothing to balance the budget
during the time the Democrats controlled the Congress, and claimed
that GOP calls for a balanced budget before the year 2010 and a
balanced budget amendment were "irresponsible." Disparage
the GOP "Contract with America" and then steal all the
ideas and claim them as their own.
Set up a "Mediscare" crisis to defeat
the GOP, and then claim it is a crisis and they have to do something
drastic. Claim that the "era of Big Government is over"
and then try to take over the entire health industry.
Arguing for "Campaign Reform, while the Democratic
Party commits fraud to win elections in Orange County and in Louisiana,
and not be punished. Argue for patriotism, while Clinton illegally
accepts money from China. Argues for "Justice", yet cannot
find John Huang to be question or try him.
Demands that "Right Wing Militias" be
tried, while protecting an FBI officer who is wanted for trial in
Idaho. Attacks the Branch Davidians in Waco to "protect the
children from child abuse" (which is not a Federal crime anyway,
and was dismissed by the Texas state), and burns them to death (please
save us from being "protected" by the Clinton administration).
The Democratic Congress passing many laws to control
the businesses and people of this country, such as Civil Rights
laws, yet excusing Congress from having to comply with those laws.
Apply laws only to Republicans, while excusing any Democrats.
Raise taxes so people have to work half the year
to pay them and many have to get two jobs, and then complain that
there is not enough volunteering. Taking people's money by force
to give to "the poor," and then claiming to be "compassionate
and generous" as long as it is not their own money they are
spending. Calling the GOP and taxpayers "greedy and uncompassionate"
when they complain that taxes are too high.
Claiming that "America is too racist"
and that this should be a "color-blind" society, and then
supporting Affirmative Action to give preferences to certain races.
Defending the First Amendment rights of free speech
and no government support of religion, yet denying the same amendment
when it says that the government shall not interfere with religion.
Complaining about the GOP being supported by tobacco
money, and Al Gore talking about how his sister died from lung cancer
caused by the tobacco companies, when his money came from growing
tobacco and selling it to those tobacco companies. Also, the Democrats
took plenty of tobacco money when they had the majority.
Claiming to be the "pro-Choice" party,
while most of their legislation is anti-choice. This deserves a
complete list of its own, including such items as the following:
Opposing giving money to the States so they can choose how to spend
it, but insist that it be directed from Washington. Forcing States
to pass 55 MPH speed limits, or they will take away their highway
money. Forcing States to pass 0.8 alcohol blood limits, or they
will take away their highway money. Requiring motorcycle riders
to wear helmets and people in cars to wear seat belts and pay for
airbags, whether they agree with them or not. Opposing the right
of the people to "keep and bear arms," in spite of it
being in the Bill of Rights.
Taking money to support art most people would not
choose to support. When the people of California voted to end Affirmative
Action, going to the courts to force it on them anyway. Opposing
"Right to Work" laws that allow people to choose if they
want to be in a union. Opposing school voucher systems that would
allow parents to choose schools for children. Opposing elimination
of affirmative action although most of the country chooses to end
it
Opposing children choosing to have prayer in schools,
but forcing them to accept passing out of condoms and "sexual
education." Forcing recycling even if people do not want to
do it. Raising taxes on people to support Liberal/Democratic ideas,
regardless of whether those taxpayers agree with the ideas or not.
Thinking that the government has more right to
people's money than the people who earned it, and deciding how much
to "allow" the taxpayers to keep.
* * *
Hypocrisy
Anita Hill thinks we should look at Bill Clinton's
stand on women's rights and the policies his administration has
championed before we judge him. Apparently you are allowed to sexually
assult women so long as you support women's rights. Using her logic,
everyone in favor of gun control should not be tried for murder
if they kill someone with a gun. What a hypocrisy. The other hypocrisy
came in Sundays New York
Times when a feminist writer said it was OK for
Slick to fondle Ms. Willy since he stopped when she said no. Let's
see how far New Gingrich would get with Hillary if he went up to
her fondled her boobs, kissed her and put her hand on his wang.
It wouldn't stop at a polite no thank you. I am sure it would be
a different story. What Hypocrisy.
* * *
The trick to the liberal media in saying they are
not biased in their reporting is what they dont say concerning liberal
people, groups, activists. But with Conservative groups they are
very complete in the reporting.
Denson
* * *
Democratic Hypocrisy agreeing with T. Perkins
My experience with liberal Democrats is that, as
T. Perkins says, their AGENDA is of PRIMARY importance to them.
The majority of liberal Democrats are like Bill and Hillary; they
believe that only they know what is best for the "masses."
They talk constantly about the children, the elderly, and the poor,
but they want to keep the children on welfare, and in a crumbling
and malfunctioning educational system. This is the very epitome
of hypocrisy!! They speak loud and long about how much they care
about "the children"; yet virtually force "the children"
to attend inner-city schools and graduate from high school with
a diploma they can scarcely read, if that! Is this true caring?
Is this true compassion? No! It's more hypocrisy. Another example:
Insisting that Congress add to the Balanced Budget Amendment (which
Bill Clinton signed into law) a clause that makes it impossible
for senior citizens to freely choose their medical doctor. As a
result, It is now illegal for senior citizens to have medical treatment
and pay for it with their own money. The doctor who provides the
service can be fined and sanctioned, as can the senior citizen.
Does this show compassion for the elderly? No! No! No!---It is simply
more hypocrisy!!!
And still more hypocrisy: Members of the Progressive
Caucus, Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangle, Barney Frank, Shelia Jackson-Lee,
Billy Scott, John Conyers (these are not all the members of Congress
who belong) work for the Democratic Socialist Cause, with the AGENDA
of making the United States a Socialist country while using our
Constitution to allow them the freedom to work toward reaching their
goal. Their agenda is to make the federal government larger and
larger, thus making the citizens more and more dependent on the
government for their survival. All of these people apparently consider
themselves to be among the potential ruling elete of a soon-to-be
(they hope) Socialist America!!! Could there be more flagrant hypocrisy???
They spin and spin for Clinton; they lie, rationalize, emotionalize,
demonize, vilify, justify, and qualify!! It does not matter what
they do or say because THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS. . They are active
SOCIALISTS disguised as Democrats, and that is THE GREATEST HYPOCRISY
OF ALL!
Kele W.
* * *
Hypocrisy-
I firmly believe that we as parents should have
the choice where WE send our children for their education. I have
2 young children, and while neither are old enough for school, I
want the right to send them where they will recieve the best education.
Further more I believe that if I chose to send them to a private
school my tax dollars should go with them. I do not want my children
in a class room where the teacher has no control over the students,
where some children can be disruptive, where they have to pass through
a metal detector for their protection or where the teachers pass
them because of athletic ability or a ratio that must be met. I
want my children to know how to read, write, do math and
understand what they have read.
I am more than willing to help them with projects
and homework, but they should be able to have a productive time
in the class room where they are taught the building blocks of education.
As for the Womans right to chose. I do not believe
that abortion is the answer to unwanted pregnancy. However, as a
woman, I believe that it is her right to chose. I would hope and
pray that her choice includes the fathers view as well. There are
many couples who are looking for children to adopt. My belief is
that ALL the options should by given and that the decision
should be made with that knowledge. In cases of a minors, parents
should have the right to know. After all if we are going to hold
parents responsible for their childrens actions that are dangerous
to the society as a whole, shouldn't parents also be informed
regarding abortion.
The problems we face today are not that different
than they were a few years back. They are just more publicized and
more wide spread. We have grown into a society that discusses every
thing. And while I think discussion is wonderful, we should teach
our children to take responsibility for their actions and not blame
everybody else. We can do this by taken responsibilty for our actions,
learning from our mistakes and makeing the efforts not to repeat
those mistakes. Our parents worried about the music we listened
to, the people we associated with, the places we went and the things
we did; and we will worry about our children. That is why family
values, morals, integrity, and character are so important. While
parents have the responsibility to teach these basic princeples
our children have a lot of role models - athlets, teachers, pastors
and clergy, scout leaders, coaches and YES EVEN politicians. There
is the letter of the law that applies to every one. It
is unjust when individuals are excused because of their"; position
in life be it athlet, police chief, military officer or president.
Tim & Lisa
* * *
When President Clinton says that the American people
want him to get back to the business of running America. Wasn't
that what he was suppose to be doing instead of having sex with
Monica?
Joseph
* * *
It's not sex, it's disrespect
This whole debacle concerning Clinton and Monica
has nothing to do with sex. If it doesn't bother Hillary, why should
we care. What does matter is where he chose to have sex.
The people of America own the White House offices.
I agree that where he lives is off limits, but his offices are public.
He showed he total disrespect for the American people by having
his "inappropriate" relation with Monica in OUR office.
HE has NO conscience, no morals, etc. and Hillary
has only an agenda. The feminist movement is a joke. They also have
an agenda and Monica and her misuse by Clinton is not a part of
their agenda.
HE NEEDS TO GO. I'VE NEVER BEEN POLLED BUT I WANT
HIM AND HER OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. LET HIM CONDUCT HIS BUSINESS
FROM MOTEL 6.
THANKS
RICH
* * *
Senators
Bill Clinton thinks he is above the law I don't
!
Our elected officials that refuse to find him guilty
must believe they are above the law also.
In the yr 2000 this should be used in campaigning
be they Demo or Rep these people need to be shown we don't want
this crap in our elected officials.
Dale
* * *
Economics
I wonder what would happen if someone pointed out a simple fact
I shall call "Liberal Hypocrisy." I have read both of
your books, and the idea of many Americans living their personal
lives based upon conservative principles while they may vote liberal
intrigued me. I tested the concept on my wife, who happens to vote
liberal.
When I frame my inquisitions in such a way that
they are at the personal or family level, she always agrees with
conservative principles. However, the moment I try to illustrate
the same point at a social level, even using the same terms, she
instantly reverts to liberal ideas. The thought occurred to me today
that this is the very essence of hypocrisy, hence the term "Liberal
Hypocrite." Believe me, I would never suggest to my wife that
she is in any way a hypocrite. I thought that you could have some
fun with this term.
Mark Maurer
* * *
JC Watts & Jesse
This past Sunday, October 17, 1999 on "Both
Sides" with Jesse Jackson, Jesse Jackson asked Rep. JC Watts
what he thought about George W. Bush not asking Pat Buchanan to
leave the GOP after Buchanan's comments on WWII and Hitler. JC responded
by suggesting that both political parties have factions within them
with stark differences of opinions on a variety of issues. JC then
cited that Democrats did not ask proud Segregationist George Wallace
to leave the Democratic party in 1968, nor did they repudiate Senator
Robert Byrd of WVA for his admitted past affiliation as a Klu Klux
Klansman.
To wit, Jesse actually attacked JC and suggested
that he (JC) was trying to impugn the integrity of Senator Byrd.
The truth will set you free Jesse. Can you believe the hyporcray
of the Reverand Doctor Jesse Jackson? Do you honestly think that
if one of our Republican Senators was a former Klansman, that Mfume,
Jackson, Clinton and Co. would rest until that Senator was driven
from public life forever?! I think not! For example, remember when
Trent Lott and Bob Barr were attacked by the NAACP, Jesse Jackson
and others for simply attending a conservative white organization
that was alleged to have supremacists ties?
The black Democrats never cease to amaze me! As
a black conservative, I find Jesse Jackon's hypocritical rhetoric
beyond offensive. I hope that you will get a copy of that transcript
and air it on fox and discuss the hyprocricy of the democratic party
for always trying to play racial politics. Jesse was clearly annoyed
that JC got the best of him on all of the issues. JC was articulate,
informed, and ready for battle. The GOP needs more articulate, attractive
African American Conservative Members ofCongress like JC to back
down the Jesse Jackson's of the world.
Sincerely,
Sophia of Lindenwold, New Jersey
* * *
The Democrats do not get it, they are the party
of "Keep em' down "
dale.ginter@eds.com
When it comes to working with the Races,the Democrats
hold on to the old Liberal approaches of Doleing out 'Programs and
Policies" to Blacks. To the Gore Limousine Liberal Democrats,
Blacks are an "Issue" to deal with, to barter for, they,
through their arrogance, believe blacks are less than second class
citizens and a problem that only a social "Keep em' down"
program can fix, General Powell stands as what true Race relationship
is about, equals, Blacks as proud members of every facet of America's
Society, Professionals, White collar, Leaders, but, as it should
be, valued members of this great American society.
The Republicans are dealing with their fellow Americans
who happen to be black,as such, Democrats see them all as an "Issue",
not even people, give em' something, and it is always meant to subjugate
them, keep em in check, If I were black, I would be outraged at
Racist Gore and the Democratic Parties portrayal of Blacks in America.
Here we are in the New millinium, and according to Democrats, blacks
are all waiting for their hand-outs, with no dignity, no self respect,
a whole race condemned by Democrats, and according to Liberal Democrats
no ability what so ever to get anything on their own, they have
to wait for Big Massa. Democrats to dole them out what they feel
they need, Democrats have returned social slavery for Blacks far
worst than Slavery it self in a lot of respects.
In separate letters, an angry J.C. Watts accused
Gore campaign chief Donna Brazile of "racist remarks,"
while Powell, the ex-Joint Chiefs of Staff boss who was wooed by
the GOP in 1996 as a potential presidential candidate, saidhe was
"disappointed and offended.
* * *
Gasoline comments
Diddo's from Antioch, CA which is about 75 miles
south of downtown Rio Linda. I heard a couple of items released
by the government today, one being that they admitted that the additive
MTBE is causing too many problems and it will be elimated, the other
was a report from USGS that MTBE is showing up in too many wells
for drinking water. I am wondering if we are getting set up for
a new gas tax, a clean up tax to fix the problems that MTBE is causing.
I listen to your show on KNBR and I also listen to a news station,
KCBS.
The very same day there was a government offical
saying that taking out MTBE and replacing it with ethanol will cost
more money and that the consumer can expect to pay higher gas prices.
The very same day they had someone from private industry saying
that using ethanol will save consumers 5 or 6 cents a gallon and
that companies are eager to ship ethanol to Caifornia. It makes
you wonder, even the most educated chemist in Rio Linda would realize
that ethanol being made from corn would have to cost less that a
chemical that is labled MTBE which is a short term for a much longer
name.
I have also noticed that Ford is selling the Ranger
pickup to use the E85 fuel which is 85% ethanol, why isn't that
being pursured more? It seems that using a fuel like that would
greatly help our own farmers and leave us out of being so dependent
on foreign oil. Steve Blankenship
* * *
Clinton
Am I missing something????????????
Clinton goes to Columbia, a foreign country, and gives away 1.3
billion dollars in one lump sum, which was funded by American
taxpayers...........However, he vetoes the death tax bill that
cost 1.05billion over a 10 year period, which he states We can't
afford to have because it is" too expensive", preventing
the American taxpayer from getting any relief!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................H
E L L O !!!! Anybody Out There????
From: "RAY
* * *
What it takes to be a good Democrat.
Virtually anyone can be a Democrat. Simply quit
thinking and vote that way. But if you want to be a GOOD Democrat,
there are some prerequisites you must have first. Compare the list
below and see how you rate.
You have to believe the AIDS virus is spread by
lack of federal funding.
You have to believe that the teacher who can't teach 4th graders
how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about
sex.You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans,
are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the
hands of the Chinese communists.
You have to believe there was no art before Federal funding.
You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by
cyclical, documented changes in the earth's climate, and more affected
by Yuppies
driving S.U.V.'s.
You have to believe that gender roles are artificial and being homosexual
is natural.
You have to be against capital punishment but support abortion on
demand
You have to believe businesses create oppression and governments
create prosperity.
You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony
activists from Seattle do.
You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually
doing something to earn it.
You have to believe that military, not corrupt politicians, start
wars.
You have to believe the NRA is bad, because it supports certain
parts of the Constitution, while the ALCU is good, because it supports
certain parts of the Constitution.
You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too
high.
You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Stienmen are
more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, General
Robert E. Lee or Thomas Edison.
You have to believe that standardized test are racist, but racial
quota and set-asides are not.
You have to believe Hillary Clinton is a real lady.
You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked
anywhere it's been tried, is because the right people haven't been
in charge.
You have to believe Republicans telling the truth belong in jail,
but a liar and sex offender belongs in the White House.
You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites
and bestiality should be constitutionally protected and manger scenes
at Christmas should be illegal.
You have to believe that illegal Democratic party funding by the
Chinese is somehow in the best interest of the United States.
From: Jerry of Lompoc, CA)
* * *
This weekend while ordering fast food I saw a man
with a boy scout shirt with his 2 teenage boys who were scouts.
I asked if he heard about the boos the invited eagle scout color
guard were given at the Democratic National Convention. He didn't
know about it. I reminded him of the media coverage given to the
gay speaker at the Republican convention.
For several days during and after the RNC the evening
news would show over and over the Texas delegates in silent protest
with heads bowed in prayer during his speech. Imagine how much more
the media pot would have been stirred if that speaker would have
been booed instead of prayed for. Isn't it funny how everyone knows
about the respectful silent protest during the RNC of a gay man
who was vocal and how almost nobody knows about the rude vocal protest
during the DNC of the boy scouts who were silent?.
What a shameful and cowardly thing for adults who
have the important responsibility of choosing the next president
to humiliate their invited teenage guests who were doing nothing
more than holding the American flag. Why didn't anyone at the convention
have the guts to make any public apologies to these young men who
represent the hope and future of our country. The words tolerence
and diversity sound nice but are turing out to be just dillusionary
political weapons.
Dave McClure 9/11/00
* * *
I wish that someone could explain to me why I am
spending over 40% of my income in taxes and according to Mr. Gore
I don't deserve a tax cut. Well he certainly did not feel that way
about the Hollywood elite. He and Clinton added a write off to the
itemized deductions his elite friends in Hollywood could make on
their taxes. Excuse me, but who is pandering to the rich and powerful---and
believe me they are powerful. You see it in the television shows---West
Wing--a liberal Democrat President---the latest movies have all
republicans portrayed as right wing wackos. Give us a break. The
Democrats paid Hollywood back by allowing them to write off expensive
wardrobes, cosmetics etc. Since the rest of us women require the
same cosmetics, etc, why can we not write them off----I'll tell
you---It's so the democrats can buy more votes with their give aways
so they can stay in power.
Pay attention---we can not afford to have another
8 years of elitism in the White House, nor do we want to make the
Motel sign permenent over the Lincoln bedroom.
Susie
* * *
Marc Rich
Years of talk about arms to the Ayattolah by the
Dems, trying to implicate REP. When the truth is known, the guns
were supplied by Marc Rich, one of the Dem. biggest contributers.
Why is this not causing a bigger reaction then it is?
T. Towers
* * *
I am compelled to express to someone my outrage
over the corruption of the left-wing liberals. They cannot abide
virtue, integrity, or virtue. For them, enemy No. 1 is authentic
morality. Consider John Ashcroft. Ted Kennedy, Diane Feinstein,
et al. would have embraced his nomination if Ashcroft had been:
the owner of abortion clinics and gay bars; and a practitioner of
bestiality (it's only sex and that's just private).
Consider the case of Bill and Monica versus the
Clarance Thomas - Anita Hill scam. Bill obtained sexual favors from
a very young White House aide. Was that tantamount to sexual harassment?
No, it was only sex. But Anita - a far more mature woman, at least
in terms of age, and lawyer - she was a victim. Why was that not
"only sex!"
Consider the case of Linda Chavez. Here is a woman
Mother Teresa would have found to be a soul-mate. Folks like Ted
and Diane believe in "the government" and only the government
helping people in need. They would not lift a finger, let alone
consider dirtying one, to help any person in need. Compassion means
to them: talk, talk, and more talk while they steal as much money
from the taxpayer as possible to add to their power. Unlike Clinton,
Linda Chavez admitted that she made a mistake when she did not disclose
the fact that she had assisted an illegal alien. She did not dodge,
did not say "it depends on what disclosure means " - she
bellied up to the bar and took the consequences. Linda Chavez not
compassionate - not according to the lefties. No, she is not compassionate.
She is a titan of true charity, mercy, and character in an era of
moral pygmies.
Those amoral and spiritually corrupt leftists cannot
abide the presence of goodness, virtue, and sanctity in the case
of some rare political persons. They have to destroy it and convince
others that they are doing the good and noble thing in the process.
That is the ultimate moral perversion.
What is so tragic is, that so many Americans swallow
Clinton's, Ted's, Diane's, Hillary's, and Jesse Jackson's "cock
and bull" stories(if you will pardon the pun) and hypocrisy.
They are taken in by what could be likened to a whited sepulcher.
How can so many persons be so long taken in by these moral cesspools?
Why are so many good Americans silent, docile, and acquiescent in
the face of all this? I think that President George W. Bush may
be our last chance. If we don't change course during the next four
years, and if he is defeated in 2004, we may be out of time. It
happened to Rome. We are not immune from decline and fall.
Thanks, Rush, for your time and for doing what
you can to help turn the tide. God bless you and God bless America.
* * *
2002 - 2003
After being in the Senate for 50 years. The Democratic
senate leaders NOW CLAIM EVERYTHING IS WRONG. Up to the last election,
the country had a surplus of money because everything was taken
care of and functioning perfectly. Now everything is broken so it
needs money to fix it. Health, tourism, police, FBI, CIA, border
guards, postal service, firemen, policemen, airports, immunization
funds, water supplies, energy, heat, gasoline and on in on. All
need fixing.
Who is responsible for this mess? Surely not the senators and congressmen
who hooted and celebrated the phony surplus of funds. Is it the
president's fault for giving the surplus back to those who over
paid the taxes? Is it the airport screeners fault?
Now this same Senate and congress want to raid the social security
funds and throw money around to cover up the fact IT failed to protect
the American people resulted it the deaths of thousands of innocent
people.
JA
* * *
Democratic Hypocrisy
I had to leave the room after watching 5 minutes
of C-SPAN's coverage of the debate on whether or not we should or
should not be allowed to burn the flag. All of these flag burners
and crappers are trying to convince themselves that this is actually
a debate over our freedoms......or, are they trying to convince
the rest of us?
The question one must ask one's self is, "Why is it that the
same people that fight for the right to burn the flag are the same
people that are protesting in order to have our right to bear arms
taken away?" The same people that are all but killing themselves
to protect animal rights are the same people that think it is perfectly
ok for a woman to kill an unborn child if she feels like it.
These people are playing a pivotal role in our society, and they
should be made to be an example for all young people, learning about
the various political views in this country. The example, for our
young people, should show how these people care nothing for their
country, or for their rights. Everything these people try to do
is just another attempt to take what is good and pure out of the
minds of our impressionable youth.
That is the only reason why homosexuals want to have a role in the
Boy Scouts. I use this as an example because the Boy Scouts, believe
it or not, still include God as an integral part of what they stand
for. If the homosexuals could take God out of that, boy wouldn't
that make them happy!
Anyway, my point is that these people don't fight for freedom. They
fight to have the legal ability to upset others who believe in what
is good and pure. They only want to upset those of us that look
at the flag as a magnificent symbol of all that this great country
stands for. Their goal is only to incite anger and aggression to
try to persuade people into believing that conservatives are the
ones who are not right in the mind. If they could become successful
at that, then maybe they could create doubt throughout this country
that God even exists. Stop the pot-smoking flag crappers now!!
I say to anyone offended by this letter: "I know your agenda,
and there are millions just like me. The majority of these others
have never voted.... but they will. You will not take God out of
the picture just so you can turn our youth into freaks like you!!!"
~American
* * *
Modified Liberal Test
You might be a liberal if...
You want to ban cigarettes and legalize marijuana
and cocaine.
You want the government to regulate any activity
that you don't engage in, with gun-control, high taxes, and massive
bureaucracy.
You believe that pornography is a Constitutional
right, but that religion and gun ownership are not.
You call for youth to "challenge authority"
but whine when they challenge YOU.
You urge women to divorce their "male tyrants"
and to have children out of wedlock, while clamoring for government
programs to help with the poverty and abuse that results.
You vigorously condemn movies or book with racist
or homophobic theme as "hate speech", but claim that the
most blood-drenched movie or videogame is completely harmless.
You believe that the best way to improve schools
is to replace Bibles with condoms, and "Reading, Writing, and
Arithmetic" with course that build "self-esteem".
You do everything for the benefit of "The
Children" - including aborting them.
You call for "choice" on abortion, but
deny the child's "choice" to live, deny the parent's right
to chose their child's school, deny the choice of how to defend
their family, deny the choice of whether to speak of their religious
beliefs at work.
You are anti-gun, anti-self defense for private
citizens, but arm your police with assault weapons and encourage
police SWAT teams to use Gestapo-like tactics.
You believe that decadent Western lifestyles are
destroying the earth by causing global warming, while you drive
a SUV, live in a new house, and watch surround-sound stereo TV.
You call for tolerance of different races and cultures,
but you are absolutely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with you.
You call for diversity of color, but not for diversity
of ideas.
You constantly comment on conservative's hypocrisy,
while ignoring your own.
You are filled with such self-loathing, that you
secretly relish the idea of the extinction of the human race.
From Ed
* * *
Unions In The Federal Government - Waste taxpayer
dollars & Influence the stalling of the Homeland Security Bill
- Through the Democratic Party - to the detriment of our Security.
I retired last spring after providing 30+ years
of service to my fellow veterans as an employee of the U.S. Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA). I worked many hours extra over the years
without additional pay nor "comp time" off to ensure the
veterans were served and the American taxpayer received their money's
worth. I spoke against waste and inefficiency whenever I could.
While I understand there is a need for a limited
role for employeeunions in the Federal government and in the VA,
I have been taken back by recent actions by the acting senior VA
health care manager for Kansas, Missouri and Southern Illinois.
I had thought when the Clinton/Gore administration left that the
pampering to the Federal employee unions in the VA would cease.
Last spring the senior health care official (who
was is a Republican) for the VA in Kansas, Missouri and Southern
Illinois was unjustly relieved of her position in part because the
employee unions complained that she would not include them in the
decisions on how the taxpayer money was spent. They objected to
her efficiencies in operations and that she cut back administrative
overhead. She would not pamper to the unions during the Clinton
years and then became less interested in their "noise"
when the unions complained after President Bush was elected.
After that official was relieved, the VA sent an
individual (a male RN) from Southern California to run the health
care operations in Kansas, Missouri and Southern Illinois. He immediately
started giving the Federal employee unions what they wanted and
consistantly over-ruled local Medical Center Directors when the
unions complained directly to him. These are the same unions that
have fought President Bush's Homeland Security proposal because
they do not want any managers being able to cut out the deadwood
or under performers. While the Secretary of the VA, Anthony Princippi,
is an honorable man who speaks of conservative values he may need
to send a message to the career leaders of the VA that the unions
are no longer to be pampered nor do should they have a direct vote
on how resources are spent. It has always been good management to
gather, whenever possible, input from rank and file before decisions
are made. Giving these unions a chance to give input is fine but
now they have an actual vote on how the resources are spent and
use it to block efficiencies that might cut unnecessary jobs.
The unions exist in part to try and protect jobs
(whether they are needed or not), they do not exist to promote efficiency
nor is their primary purpose in the VA to promote better service
to the veterans who have honorably served this great country. I
suggest you obtain the information that is being compiled by the
U.S. office of Personnel Management (OPM) on how much "official
time" is now granted by Federal agencies for union officers
to perform union duties while collecting a salary check paid by
the American taxpayer. It is one of the biggest waste of tax dollars
I ever saw while I was still employed.
* * *
The BIG lie...
This week's "Braying Jackass" award:
"...[Republicans] have the most wrong-headed economic policies
that we've seen since Herbert Hoover and we're beginning to pay
a price as a nation for these policies." --Sen. Ms. Hillary
Rodham-Clinton-Rodham
This week's "Alpha Jackass" award: "And
now they want to give another tax cut. It doesn't make sense. We
shouldn't do it now. It's against arithmetic." --B.J. Clinton
On the Left...
If there is a universal truth when it comes to
Leftist Démocrates, it is that they are, universally, hypocrites.
Currently, they are simultaneously condemning Sen. Rick Santorum
as an "intolerant bigot" for disagreeing with their homosexual
agenda, while demanding "tolerance" for their anti-war
agenda.
To wit, consider this rant from Sen. Ms. Hillary
Rodham-Clinton-Rodham: "Republicans, you see...act as though
they have a monopoly on the right to have answers. And that they
have a monopoly on the exercise of power. So in their world, debate
is not one of their higher values, because it exposes the weakness
of their answers and it threatens the strength of their authority."
If you have heard any of Ms. Rodham-Clinton-Rodham's
"debate" about Mr. Santorum's comments, you know why her
assertions are laughably hypocritical. Of course, when she says
debate, she means "the politics of personal destruction."
From the "Non Compos Mentis" Files: "I
would point out that we have virtually abandoned the war on terrorism;
that we have withdrawn military and intelligence capabilities from
Afghanistan and, because of that, al-Qa'ida has been able to regroup.
...I don't think that's a very impressive national-security record."
--Florida Sen. Bob Graham, now a Démocrate presidential candidate,
on ABC's "This Week." What planet is this guy on?
Arlene
